Adam Thierer

Adam Thierer

  • Senior Research Fellow

Adam Thierer is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University with the Technology Policy Program. His primary research interests are technology, media, Internet, and free speech policy issues, with a particular focus on online child safety and digital privacy policy issues. 

Thierer has spent almost two decades in the public policy research community. He previously served as president of the Progress & Freedom Foundation, director of Telecommunications Studies at the Cato Institute, senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, and researcher at the Adam Smith Institute in London.

Thierer is the author or editor of seven books on diverse topics such as media regulation and child safety issues, mass media regulation, Internet governance and jurisdiction, intellectual property, regulation of network industries, and the role of federalism within high-technology markets. He received his BA in journalism and political science at Indiana University and his MA in international business management and trade theory at the University of Maryland.

Thierer has served on several distinguished online safety task forces, including Harvard Law School’s Internet Safety Technical Task Force, a “Blue Ribbon Working Group” on child safety organized by Common Sense Media, the iKeepSafe Coalition, and the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration’s Online Safety and Technology Working Group. He is also an advisor to the American Legislative Exchange Council’s Telecom & IT Task Force. In 2008, Thierer received the Family Online Safety Institute’s Award for Outstanding Achievement.

Thierer blogs at The Technology Liberation Front.

Follow Adam on Google+

Published Research

Adam Thierer, Brent Skorup | Apr 01, 2013
Are information sectors sufficiently different from other sectors of the economy such that more stringent antitrust standards should be applied to them preemptively? Columbia Law School professor Tim Wu responds in the affirmative in his book The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires. Wu proposes preventing vertical mergers in the information economy and the mandatory divestiture of vertically integrated companies. To implement this, Wu proposes a Separations Principle for the information economy, which would segregate information providers into three buckets, which we have labeled information creators, information distributors, and hardware makers.
Adam Thierer | Mar 18, 2013
This Article—which focuses not on privacy rights against the government, but against private actors—cuts against the grain of much modern privacy scholarship by suggesting that expanded regulation is not the most constructive way to go about ensuring greater online privacy.
Adam Thierer | Jan 25, 2013
This paper will consider the structure of fear appeal arguments in technology policy debates and then outline how those arguments can be deconstructed and refuted in both cultural and economic contexts. Several examples of fear appeal arguments will be offered with a particular focus on online child safety, digital privacy, and cybersecurity. The various factors contributing to “fear cycles” in these policy areas will be documented.
Adam Thierer | Nov 2011
Going forward, the Brown v. EMA ruling will force state and local governments to change their approach to regulating all modern media content.

Working Papers

Charts

Policy Briefs

Testimony & Comments

Adam Thierer | Apr 24, 2013
Even if Do Not Track takes root and some consumers turn it on, many will be incentivized by ad networks or publishers to opt right back in to “tracking” to retain access to sites and services they desire. In doing so, they may end up sharing even more information than they do today. Moreover, this may drive still greater consolidation since larger players will be in a position to grant Internet-wide opt-in exceptions, while smaller providers cannot…
Jerry Brito, Eli Dourado, Adam Thierer | Apr 23, 2013
In analyzing the proposed policies being developed to carry out Congress’s mandate, it is important to remember that the purpose of the mandate is to open America’s skies to commercial UAS use in order to reap the social benefits that such use will bring.
Adam Thierer | Dec 22, 2011
In this public interest comment to the Federal Trade Commission, Adam Thierer addresses how the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) affects online content and digital innovation.
Adam Thierer | Mar 30, 2011
Adam Thierer submitted written testimony on a Senate Hearing on The State of Online Privacy.

Research Summaries & Toolkits

Speeches & Presentations

Expert Commentary

Apr 27, 2013

Evgeny Morozov’s latest book, To Save Everything, Click Here, follows the same blueprint as his first book, 2011’s The Net Delusion. He takes the over-zealous ramblings of a handful of Internet evangelists, suggests that Pollyannas like them are all around us, and then argues, implausibly, that their very ideas threaten to undermine our culture or humanity in some fashion. Along the way, he doles out generous heapings of unremitting, snarky scorn.
Oct 14, 2012

The paramount public policy goal should be to foster an environment where ongoing experimentation is allowed so that the best solutions emerge over time in response to fluctuating broadband supply and demand. “Public policies allowing providers the freedom to experiment best preserve the spirit of innovation that has characterized the Internet since its inception,” argues Lyons. Rejecting calls to regulate data policies and usage-based pricing is the first best step toward ensuring that goal.
Sep 16, 2012

Let the speech flow! Generally speaking, that should be the default policy that private information and communications companies adopt when devising speech policies for their platforms. Yet, it won’t always be the rule for a simple reason: When you serve a diverse audience, someone is always going to complain that you’re not doing enough to cater to their unique values, interests, or sensitivities.
Aug 17, 2012

It should be clear why it would be a mistake to convert Facebook into Fedbook. Nationalizing Facebook would set a dangerous precedent for government control over speech-producing and distributing networks and resources. With “social networking” in a state of constant flux, such a radical intervention would be particularly misguided.

Contact

Adam Thierer
  • twitter: twitter.com/AdamThierer

Books

Adam Thierer | Jan 31, 2011
A response to fans of the Internet who fear that dark days lie ahead unless steps are taken to "save the Net" from a variety of ills, especially the perceived end of "openness."

Podcasts

Adam Thierer | May 09, 2013
Adam Thierer Discusses Online Sales Tax Legislation on America's Radio Network…