Regulation University

Regulation University

Regulation University is a series of educational programs designed for congressional staff to provide the skills and information essential to regulatory oversight and to understand the legal and institutional framework that produces and supports federal regulation.

Research

Sherzod Abdukadirov | Jul 17, 2012
Administrations face fewer political constraints during the midnight period and, thus, take the opportunity to impose their policy preferences. These rushed, politically motivated regulations have poor quality analysis and face less stringent oversight from OIRA. Stemming the surge of midnight regulations requires comprehensive reform to constrain agencies’ ability to issue too many regulations and improve OIRA’s ability to oversee regulatory quality during the midnight period.
Randall Lutter | Apr 18, 2012
There are many obstacles to better regulatory measurement, analysis and review. But major setbacks include the agencies’ lack of impartiality in reviewing their existing regulations, an inappropriately narrow focus, and a failure to promote steps to better measure the actual benefits vs. the costs of regulations.
Eli Dourado, Jerry Brito | Mar 06, 2012
Like gardens, the Internet developed without government intervention. Unnecessary regulation could break down the norms and practices that caused the Internet flourish in the first place.
James Broughel, Jerry Ellig | Feb 21, 2012
This Mercatus on Policy shows how regulatory process reforms should require agencies to thoroughly analyze alternatives and publish that analysis for public comment before they propose a regulation.
Thomas Stratmann, J. W. Verret | Jan 17, 2012
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 gave the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) the authority to adopt a proxy access rule. Though the legislation urged an exemption for companies with less than $75 million in market capitalization, the SEC unexpectedly failed to provide a permanent exemption from the rule for those companies. This paper finds that, for the roughly 900 publicly traded companies studied with under $75 million in market capitalization, the proxy access rule caused on the order of $335 million in shareholder losses.
Christopher J. Conover, Jerry Ellig | Jan 09, 2012
This Mercatus on Policy catalogs the main deficiencies of the regulatory analysis for the ACA regulations and compares them to other economically significant regulations proposed in 2008 and 2009.

Testimony & Comments

Speeches & Presentations

Videos

Henry Butler J. W. Verret, Jerry Brito, Henry Butler | May 01, 2012
This panel addresses regulatory issues in three major policy areas: Technology -- Is regulation necessary to ensure cybersecurity? What should we know about market responses to cyber threats before we select a course of action? Health Care -- What is the market failure in health care? What roles do the federal and state governments have in finding solutions? Financial Markets -- When does federal pre-emption produce bad outcomes in financial regulation? How to recognize a regulatory failure and what to do about it.
Todd Zywicki | April 03, 2012
Todd Zywicki examines the degree to which executive branch and independent agencies are subject to checks and balances on their regulatory authority. Topics include why it is necessary to regulate regulators, the factors that strength or weaken regulatory accountability, and what Nixon-era bureaucracy and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau have in common.
J. W. Verret | March 01, 2012
Several key debates this year will focus on the economic impact of federal regulations. The Mercatus Center at George Mason University is pleased to offer a series of courses designed to help congressional staff better understand the regulatory process. The first course uses examples from newly-minted financial markets regulations to review: -The stages involved in developing and finalizing a regulation -How to find and use information about a regulation -The best tools to help policy makers make the case for or against a change in regulation…

Podcasts

Keith Hall | June 14, 2013
Keith Hall at Regulation University: The Employment Costs of Regulation
Hester Peirce | April 09, 2013
Hester Peirce Discusses Dodd Frank at this Regulation University event.
Lawrence H. White | April 03, 2013
It is commonly understood that the Federal Reserve determines monetary policy, but less well known is its role as a broad-based federal regulator of financial holding companies, select state banks, international bank operations, designated systemically important non-bank financial companies, and systemically important financial market utilities. Lawrence H. White examined how the Fed regulates and affects monetary policy.
Patrick McLaughlin | March 28, 2013
It is widely acknowledged that an agency’s decision to create a new regulation should be informed by an analysis of the regulation’s potential benefits and costs. The quality of these analyses, however, depends on the availability and appropriate use of information about potential benefits and costs. This program examines factors that can inflate benefit estimates and the implications of benefit inflation to regulatory policy and the reasons why certain costs of a regulation can be hidden even from those who bear that cost.

Recent Events

Keith Hall | June 14, 2013
Mercatus scholar Keith Hall will explain what agencies miss in their employment impact analysis for regulation, and what implications that raises for policymakers concerned about the economic impact of regulation over the long-term.
Lawrence H. White | April 03, 2013
Please join the Mercatus Center for Regulation University’s 2013 series. Lawrence H. White, Ph.D a Senior Scholar at Mercatus, will discuss the Federal Reserve and its dual role as both chief monetary policy manager and a rising federal financial regulator.
Patrick McLaughlin | March 27, 2013
Please join the Mercatus Center for Regulation University’s 2013 series. Patrick McLaughlin, Ph.D a Senior Research Fellow at Mercatus, will discuss how errors, information gaps and misapplied theory can inflate regulatory benefit estimates, and why the costs of regulation can be difficult to nail down.

Experts

Maurice McTigue is vice president for outreach at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. He is director of the Mercatus Center's Government Accountability Project and a member of its Spending and Budget Initiative and State and Local Policy Project.
Jerry Ellig is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. His primary research interests include the federal regulatory process, economic regulation, and telecommunications regulation.
Jerry Brito is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center and directs the Technology Policy Program. His primary research interests are technology and telecommunications policy, government transparency and accountability, and the regulatory process.