Sherzod Abdukadirov

Sherzod Abdukadirov

  • Research Fellow

Sherzod Abdukadirov is a research fellow in the Regulatory Studies Program at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. He specializes in the federal regulatory process, institutional reforms, food and health, and social complexity.

Abdukadirov has prepared numerous policy briefs on regulatory issues, has written for US News & World Report, and also for scholarly journals such as Regulation, Constitutional Political Economy, and Asian Journal of Political Science.

Abdukadirov received his PhD in public policy from George Mason University and his BS in information technology from Rochester Institute of Technology.

Published Research

Working Papers

Sherzod Abdukadirov | Apr 28, 2015
This paper argues that health advocates are too quick to blame consumers for the ineffectiveness of information disclosure policies. Using the NFP as an example, the paper shows that information disclosures are often poorly designed and fail to actually inform consumers. They often fail to account for how consumers perceive and interpret information or for the differences in their socioeconomic backgrounds. Thus, it may not be consumers’ behavioral biases but rather poor policy design and implementation that is responsible for the NFP’s ineffectiveness. Consequently, the paper argues that nutrition labels should follow smart disclosure principles, which emphasize information salience and usability.
Sherzod Abdukadirov | May 29, 2014
Over the decades, regulatory reforms have sought to increase agency accountability and improve the quality of regulatory analysis and decision-making, with varying success. In this paper, I draw upon previous reform experiences to identify four criteria for effective reforms.
Sherzod Abdukadirov | Dec 18, 2012
This study attempts to shed some light on whether the benefits claimed by the federal agencies are likely to be achieved. In contrast to other validation studies, the study focuses on the agencies’ benefit claims rather than the actually measured benefits. Since agencies justify their regulatory decisions based on expected benefits, examining the quality of these claims is important.
Sherzod Abdukadirov | Nov 08, 2012
This paper examines whether political motivation plays a role in the timing of some midnight regulations. It further examines whether political motivation has a negative impact on the analytical quality of midnight regulations. In contrast to other studies that focus on the overall regulatory activity using proxies, this paper concentrates on a detailed analysis of three regulations issued in the final days of the Bush administration.


Policy Briefs

Testimony & Comments

Research Summaries & Toolkits

Media Clippings

Expert Commentary

Jul 06, 2015

The advantage of market solutions is that they do not impose a single solution on all consumers. Given the difference among consumers and the possibility that the DOE overestimated the potential energy savings, it is important to let consumers decide what purchasing decision makes sense in their specific circumstances. Instead of imposing a single standard on all consumers, the DOE should let markets help consumers make an informed choice.
Jun 03, 2015

The Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers recently finalized a regulation that redefines the scope of the agencies’ power over waterways in the United States. This comes on the heels of a report by The New York Times about a controversial campaign launched by the EPA to drum up support for the new water regulation by collaborating with non-governmental groups such as the Sierra Club.
Jun 01, 2015

The DOE should stop misusing behavioral economics to justify more stringent energy efficiency standards. These regulations are based on a flawed assumption that failure to save a trivial amount over more than a decade is proof of consumers' irrationality. Restricting consumer choice should count as costs, not benefits to consumers.
May 05, 2015

Obesity is a major health problem in the United States. The traditional response to unhealthy dietary choices was to educate and inform consumers through the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and the nutrition label. Yet as the nutrition label failed to improve consumers' dietary choices, health advocates shifted to more intrusive measures like the recently adopted soda tax in Berkeley, California.


' '