Toward a Constitutional Theory of Property Rights to Escape the Transitional Gains Trap: A View from the Machiavellians

Published by Springer

Since at least Adam Smith, political economists have inquired into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. From a public choice perspective, this economic transition from poverty to wealth can be reframed in terms of an escape from the transitional gains trap (Tullock, Bell J Econ 6(2):671–678, 1975). Understood this way, the question of why the West first escaped from poverty is a question into how the political process gradually transformed from a means to secure privileges to a means to secure private property rights. Such an inquiry implies that any realistic inquiry into economic and political development must entail a study of how and why violence becomes organized throughout society in the foreground of analysis. Taking inspiration from Burnham’s The Machiavellians (1943), I will offer a constitutional theory of property rights grounded in classical liberal theory, one that emerges as a by-product of political exchange and entrepreneurship (Wagner, Papers Non-Market Decision Making 1:161–170, 1966). From a constitutional perspective, I argue that private property rights emerge to internalize the cost of using violence, particularly to minimize rent dissipation from escaping the transitional gains trap. I illustrate this argument through the lens of entangled political economy by explaining the emergence of constitutional democracy in Western Europe as by-product of political exchange.

Additional Details

Find the full chapter here.

Mercatus AI Assistant
Ask questions about this research.
GPT Logo
Mercatus AI Research Assistant
Ask questions about this research. Mercatus Chatbot AI More Details
Suggested Prompts:
Ask us anything. We use OpenAI's ChatGPT 4o base model to answer any question about Mercatus research.