Dustin Chambers

-
Senior Affiliated ScholarProfessor of Economics, Salisbury University
Dustin Chambers is a Professor of Economics in the Perdue School of Business at Salisbury University and a Senior Affiliated Scholar with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Dr. Chambers is an applied econometrician who has published widely on the topics of income inequality, poverty, and economic growth. His most recent research focuses on the regressive effects of government regulations, including their unintended impact on consumer prices, entrepreneurship, and social mobility vis-a-vis income inequality and poverty. He earned his MA in economics from UCLA and his PhD in economics from the University of California at Riverside.
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
North Dakota’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Rhode Island’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Pennsylvania’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
New York’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Oklahoma’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Oregon’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Ohio’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
South Dakota’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Tennessee’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Wisconsin’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
Vermont’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Oregon’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Texas’ Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Utah’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Kentucky’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Illinois’ Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Florida’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Georgia’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Indiana’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Hawaii’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
Latest Work
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Nevada
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in New Hampshire
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in New Mexico
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in New York
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in North Carolina
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in North Dakota
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Ohio
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Oklahoma
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Oregon
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Pennsylvania
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
Illinois’ Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Florida’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Georgia’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Hawaii’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Massachusetts’ Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Louisiana’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Michigan’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Kentucky’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Maryland’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Indiana’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences