Dustin Chambers

-
Senior Affiliated ScholarProfessor of Economics, Salisbury University
Dustin Chambers is a Professor of Economics in the Perdue School of Business at Salisbury University and a Senior Affiliated Scholar with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Dr. Chambers is an applied econometrician who has published widely on the topics of income inequality, poverty, and economic growth. His most recent research focuses on the regressive effects of government regulations, including their unintended impact on consumer prices, entrepreneurship, and social mobility vis-a-vis income inequality and poverty. He earned his MA in economics from UCLA and his PhD in economics from the University of California at Riverside.
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
Michigan’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Missouri’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Maryland’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Montana’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Maine’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
North Carolina’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
North Dakota’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
New Hampshire’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
New Mexico’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
New Jersey’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
Massachusetts’ Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Louisiana’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Michigan’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Kentucky’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Maryland’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Indiana’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Maine’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Kansas’ Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Iowa’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
New Hampshire’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
Latest Work
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Delaware
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Florida
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Georgia
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Hawaii
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Idaho
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Illinois
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Indiana
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Iowa
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Kansas
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Kentucky
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
Michigan’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Missouri’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Maryland’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Montana’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Maine’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
North Carolina’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
North Dakota’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
New Hampshire’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
New Mexico’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
New Jersey’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences