Dustin Chambers

-
Senior Affiliated ScholarProfessor of Economics, Salisbury University
Dustin Chambers is a Professor of Economics in the Perdue School of Business at Salisbury University and a Senior Affiliated Scholar with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Dr. Chambers is an applied econometrician who has published widely on the topics of income inequality, poverty, and economic growth. His most recent research focuses on the regressive effects of government regulations, including their unintended impact on consumer prices, entrepreneurship, and social mobility vis-a-vis income inequality and poverty. He earned his MA in economics from UCLA and his PhD in economics from the University of California at Riverside.
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
New York’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Nebraska’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Oklahoma’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Nevada’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Ohio’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
South Carolina’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
South Dakota’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Rhode Island’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Pennsylvania’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Tennessee’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
North Carolina’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
South Carolina’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Alabama's Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Idaho’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
California’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Arizona’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Alaska’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Connecticut’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Colorado’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Delaware’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
Latest Work
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Louisiana
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Maine
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Maryland
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Massachusetts
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Michigan
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Minnesota
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Mississippi
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Missouri
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Montana
- | Regulation Regulation
- | Policy Briefs Policy Briefs
The Regressive Effects of Regulations in Nebraska
Latest Work
- | Feature Feature
New Mexico’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
New Jersey’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Mississippi’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Minnesota’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Nebraska’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Missouri’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Montana’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
Nevada’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
North Carolina’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences
- | Feature Feature
South Carolina’s Regulatory Landscape
Federal and State Rules and Some of Their Unintended Consequences